Mallozzi's Mailbag & More II

heisenberg

heisenberg

Earl Grey
Edwina Karch writes: “Will you please put the interviews with the actors on an extra DVD for SGU, and are there any more of the kino episodes I havn’t seen one in a long time.”​
Answer: Sorry. I have no control over what ends up on the dvd’s. That’s a studio call. But, for what it’s worth, the interviews would be owned by Canada’s Space Channel since they produced them for broadcaster.​
majorsal writes: “what fate Sam&Jack?”​
Answer: I’m sorry to say there will be no canon confirmation of the relationship between Sam & Jack. But, in my mind, they’ve been an official couple since Threads.​
Fancy Trav writes: “Obviously Stargate Universe is over after 2 seasons. Is that a definate that it is over forever? Has a good run and support so may be able to get it back on? Another network “may” pick it up? Or am I hoping too much and its over for good??”​
Answer: Again, sorry to be the bearer of bad news but it is over for SG-1, Atlantis, and Universe.​
irish pete writes: “Could Brad give an outline of how he wants to end the series to an author for 1 book or maybe a handful?”​
Answer: That would be up to Brad – and MGM.​
archersangel writes: “count me in the camp of wondering what RDA didn’t like about prometheus? are you saving that for your season 6 reminisce?”​
Answer: Yep. You’ll have to wait until I finish reminiscing my way through SG-1′s fifth season.​
JeffW writes: “Still curious if Peter DeLuise was referencing someone’s proclivity for large explosions when he was yelling “Bigger!” for more of a fireball (perhaps a running gag?), or was it just an ad-lib?”​
Answer: I believe it was a reference to his own proclivity for bigger BOOMS!​
Don Matthews writes: “Are we gonna find out that the drones are an outgrowth of Destiny’s decendants?”​
Answer: Alas, we will not. Of course, that’s not say we wouldn’t have.​
Click to expand...

http://josephmallozzi.wordpress.com/2011/05/05/may-5-2011-doggies-eating-peanut-butter/
 
shavedape

shavedape

Well Known GateFan
Do you think Joe will show up here? Do you???

Oh please Joey! Please come visit us here! We'll stroke your undeserving ego and make you feel like the big shot that you're not. Please Joey -- PLEASE!!!

Beatles.jpg
 
Terran77

Terran77

Captain Tightpants
shavedape said:
Oh please Joey! Please come visit us here! We'll stroke your undeserving ego and make you feel like the big shot that you're not. Please Joey -- PLEASE!!!

View attachment 4139
Click to expand...
Uhm, HELLO... he is a big shot! :mad:

He eats dinner in fancy places with actors, has adorable little pugs that he forces to wear costumes, and his sycophant fans mail him packages of fancy French macaroons.

ROCK STAR! CLEARLY!

He's eccentric enough to practically be living alone in some mansion, ordering takeout for a couple of goddesses! GOSH!!!

:laughing:
 
S

Stonelesscutter

Guest
How come this thread has 16 pages here while it has 202 pages on SFN?
Nevermind, I just noticed that this is thread 2 instead of 1.
 
Overmind One

Overmind One

GateFans Gatemaster
Staff member
Stonelesscutter said:
How come this thread has 16 pages here while it has 202 pages on SFN?
Nevermind, I just noticed that this is thread 2 instead of 1.
Click to expand...

The original SGUS thread is in Flame Hell because it violates our CCPG. Our Mozz thread is new for GateFans, as is the Ratings thread and the Ratings Predictions thread. There was no thread started at SFN for Mallozzi. The thread that is there is the one started at a different website called SGU Sucks Forums.
 
S

Stonelesscutter

Guest
Overmind One said:
The original SGUS thread is in Flame Hell because it violates our CCPG. Our Mozz thread is new for GateFans, as is the Ratings thread and the Ratings Predictions thread. There was no thread started at SFN for Mallozzi. The thread that is there is the one started at a different website called SGU Sucks Forums.
Click to expand...

I got it. ;)
 
shavedape

shavedape

Well Known GateFan
Stonelesscutter said:
How come this thread has 16 pages here while it has 202 pages on SFN?
Nevermind, I just noticed that this is thread 2 instead of 1.
Click to expand...

So that's it? Surely you have something to say about JoMo's latest shenanigans? Don't deny us your pithy and withering analysis of the latest tit-for-tat cronyism of Joe and Darren. C'mon, spill!
 
heisenberg

heisenberg

Earl Grey
I’ve had my share of online skirmishes. Not surprising give the fact that I: a) maintain a consistent (daily) internet presence and, b) work in a genre with notoriously passionate (rabid) fans. In the past, the blow-outs have progressed thusly -
1. A certain section of fandom objects to a creative decision made.
2. The angry fans vent in various forums, criticizing said decision and the people (TPTB) who made it.
3. Eventually, the outrage washes up on the shores of this blog and I offer my take on why the decision was made and/or why I thought it was the right call.
4. A certain group within that group of critics takes exception to my response and counters, sometimes with rude and/or immature remarks.
5. I call them on their behavior.
6. They grow even more outraged and lets the insults fly.
7. Repeats steps 5 and 6 as many times as required.
All this to say that readers of this blog know I’m no stranger to controversy. Which is why, two years ago, I was intrigued to read of another genre writer/producer, James Moran, who was experiencing a firestorm of fan fury over a creative decision made by TPTB over on Torchwood. The original blog post is here (http://jamesmoran.blogspot.com/2009/07/stepping-back.html) and, while perusing it, I was struck by the similarities to some of my experiences dealing with fandom. For instance:
“Why? I started trying to discuss it, but swiftly realised that it was pointless. It simply turns into “No it isn’t” / “Yes it is”, and there’s no way I can win the argument, because in certain people’s opinion, I am wrong, and that’s the end of it. And it’s all just opinion anyway. It would also feel like I was trying to justify the show, and I’m not doing that. I have absolutely no need to. The show is the show. Whether you like it or dislike it, that’s up to you.”


and
“I’ve received over a thousand messages from viewers talking about the show. The vast majority have been extremely positive. Even though many of them are upset, angry and shocked, they have managed to express that without making it personal. So to you, I’m extremely grateful. I’m glad you liked the show, and love that it made you respond so strongly. I can’t reply to everyone, it’d take weeks, so please accept my thanks.
But the rest of the messages? Unacceptable. Some have been spewing insults and passive aggressive nonsense. Accusing me of deliberately trying to mislead, lie, and hurt people. Telling me I hate the fans…”
Sound familiar?
So delighted was I to discover a kindred spirit that I fired off an email that essentially welcomed him “to the wonderful world of online fan interaction!”. He kindly responded. We commiserated. And, over the years, have continued to touch base on various – thankfully – non-internet related matters.
Click to expand...
http://josephmallozzi.wordpress.com...ry-and-reflecting-back-on-sg-1s-fifth-season/


This is where he talks about the notorious season 5 where, daniel Jackson was killed off...lol I remember that moment :lol:. And he's been reading around forums that criticized the decisions he took.


 
Overmind One

Overmind One

GateFans Gatemaster
Staff member
Perhaps Transporter will exhonerate him.

heisenberg said:
http://josephmallozzi.wordpress.com...ry-and-reflecting-back-on-sg-1s-fifth-season/


This is where he talks about the notorious season 5 where, daniel Jackson was killed off...lol I remember that moment :lol:. And he's been reading around forums that criticized the decisions he took.
Click to expand...

Maybe he has learned from his mistakes. He seems to WANT to do better by the fans. He says he is online every day, so that means he is more in touch with the sort who watch science fiction than somebody who is not online much. Brad does not strike me as a good or even that interested in computers. For Mozz, its an appliance/portal like it is for most of us here. That is a GOOD thing.

Every personal account of Joe that I have heard has surprised me a bit. They are overwhelmingly impressions of "he is a good guy" and "boyish charm" :puke::). But I have never met the man and am willing to see him try to make himself a bit more humble.

I dont like this strokefest he and Darren have had here recently, but I do understand it. Gateworld did PR for Stargate for quite a long time...they almost OWE them a piggy back boost. But it wont last very long.
 
shavedape

shavedape

Well Known GateFan
All this to say that readers of this blog know I’m no stranger to controversy. Which is why, two years ago, I was intrigued to read of another genre writer/producer, James Moran, who was experiencing a firestorm of fan fury over a creative decision made by TPTB over on Torchwood. The original blog post is here (http://jamesmoran.blogspot.com/2009/...ping-back.html) and, while perusing it, I was struck by the similarities to some of my experiences dealing with fandom. For instance:
“Why? I started trying to discuss it, but swiftly realised that it was pointless. It simply turns into “No it isn’t” / “Yes it is”, and there’s no way I can win the argument, because in certain people’s opinion, I am wrong, and that’s the end of it. And it’s all just opinion anyway. It would also feel like I was trying to justify the show, and I’m not doing that. I have absolutely no need to. The show is the show. Whether you like it or dislike it, that’s up to you.”
Click to expand...

I'm pretty sure TPTB for "Torchwood" took fan criticism into account and did their best to rectify the issues plaguing the show. This is the major difference between TPTB of "Torchwood" verses TPTB of SGU. The proof is in the next paragraph where JM dismisses fan opinion as having zero impact on how the show is created. "The show is the show" couldn't be more clear. He's saying, quite clearly, 'This is the product we're giving you and if you don't like it tough titty!'

The folks at "Torchwood" didn't have this attitude and that's probably why the show is still in production. It had several seasons plus a third series and now has a fourth series being produced with big name actors. It's a fact, TPTB for "Torchwood" listened to fan criticism of the show and responded accordingly. TPTB for SGU did not. "Torchwood" is still going strong. SGU is not.

JM has a lot of nerve comparing himself to James Moran. And even if he's speaking in terms of SG-1 season 5 that means he didn't learn his lesson as the failure of SGU proves. If anything this admission only makes him look more ridiculous as he's had years to learn from the Daniel Jackson/fan reaction experience. Duh!
 
mzzz

mzzz

Well Known GateFan
shavedape said:
I'm pretty sure TPTB for "Torchwood" took fan criticism into account and did their best to rectify the issues plaguing the show. This is the major difference between TPTB of "Torchwood" verses TPTB of SGU. The proof is in the next paragraph where JM dismisses fan opinion as having zero impact on how the show is created. "The show is the show" couldn't be more clear. He's saying, quite clearly, 'This is the product we're giving you and if you don't like it tough titty!'

The folks at "Torchwood" didn't have this attitude and that's probably why the show is still in production. It had several seasons plus a third series and now has a fourth series being produced with big name actors. It's a fact, TPTB for "Torchwood" listened to fan criticism of the show and responded accordingly. TPTB for SGU did not. "Torchwood" is still going strong. SGU is not.

JM has a lot of nerve comparing himself to James Moran. And even if he's speaking in terms of SG-1 season 5 that means he didn't learn his lesson as the failure of SGU proves. If anything this admission only makes him look more ridiculous as he's had years to learn from the Daniel Jackson/fan reaction experience. Duh!
Click to expand...

What? There's nothing wrong with the show. What the hell are you talking about? The show's next to godliness. You just don't get it. It's too cerebral for you. You're just a angry atlantis fan. lol
 
Inara

Inara

GateFans Noob
Overmind One said:
Maybe he has learned from his mistakes. He seems to WANT to do better by the fans.
Click to expand...

After many years of observing his interactions with viewers, I think it's more that he wants to play nice in the hopes they'll give his new show a watch. He knows a lot of people are unhappy not only with his actions regarding show decisions, but his comments online. He has a tendency to think that fans who share similar opinion are one coherent entity, so he's often handed out insults to a group versus an individual who commented on his blog. There's a difference there, and I don't think he gets it or wants to, because his comments generate publicity. No such thing as bad publicity and all that.

Same with the strokefest of GW. It's a ready-made publicity source for his new venture, and he already has an established relationship with them, handing out exclusives and the "officially unofficial" seal of approval. Haven't been over there in years, but posting news about projects TPTB and the actors are now involved in probably will be the fuel to keep them going in a Stargate-less world.
 
Tropicana

Tropicana

Council Member
The SGU squees keep reiterating the fact that they are way smarter and intelligent compared to folks that prefer SG-1/SGA. Looking at Transporter films, it's mostly explosions and guns and hand-to-hand combat. Gee, I don't think the squees would get Transporter, and may even find the series stupid. Does Mallozzi really want those sort of viewers, demanding he show 100% character development - more talking and less action? To cut down on aspects that makes Transporter a global success?

If I were Mallozzi, I would avoid them at all cost, that's just asking for trouble.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top