you keep doing this
you claim that Trek is based on the scientifically possible, but when you are asked to explain how something like inertia dampeners or transporters are scientifically possibly, then you say something like, "there not, its just a plot device/ its fiction/ etc,etc, what seems to suit you that day" in response
so, if red matter is impossible do you mean it is impossible per current scientific knowledge/theory or in Trek-verse knowledge/ theory?
or, are you just saying that it is impossible because it fits the narrative of JJ trek sucking? --WHICH IT DOES IMO
It is impossible because of the laws of the physical universe. If you don't know much about physics or theoretical science, then you won't know what lies in the realm of possiblity (and hence science-fiction) and what does not. I don't know how familiar you are with physics or theoretical science in regards to electromagnetic fields, subatomic particles, etc.
but then we have the owners of Trek saying that Romulus being destroyed and prime Spock going through that wormhole as canon--- either here in Picard and in some comics or a book. so TPTBs have chose to at least in part, take in JJ trek as canon--at least those parts which occurred in the Prime verse like Romulus being destroyed and Spock
disappearing SOLELY BY including those two events into PICARD
The owners are not creators. They do not become creators by buying something created by somebody else. Art is never the result of a committee, only a single artist. Committees only produce products. Owners create nothing and do not have the right to deface art created by somebody else. If you buy the Mona Lisa then if you want, you can paint a moustache on her. Does that make it okay? Yes, because you bought the painting, but no because what you have now is a vandalized piece of art that you had no hand in creating.
SO, does that make PICARD not canon for being based on a bit of JJ verse stuff or does it make only a small part of JJ verse selectively canon?
without having seen PICARD other then the first ep, I am inclined to accept the second option. that we cant throw out all of PICARD as not counting because a portion of its premise is based on a small part of the JJ crap. when in fact, it seems as if so much of PICARD is based on TNG/VOYAGER etc.
You must not be watching all the episodes then! Kurtzman hired these actors to play people in Picard who have the names of the characters they portrayed, but the characters you see in the show act nothing like their TNG/Voyager characters. I am watching every episode at least twice.