Yeah, not the same thing. One has elements of theoretical and actual science built into the genre and the other is just pure nonsensical fantasy.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk
Yeah, not the same thing. One has elements of theoretical and actual science built into the genre and the other is just pure nonsensical fantasy.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk
See, that's consistent. You accept the genre for what it is, absolute fun nonsense that needn't be explained too thoroughly. If they do, it opens the whole thing up to too much scrutiny on other matters and destroys it.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk
That's why I disliked SGU more than anything else, it invited the scrutiny, and failed
Kaiju movies may not, but that is not what Bluce is saying, he is saying Pac Rim does.
True.
Basically Pacific Rim was a touch more logically grounded than other Kaiju films (and indeed than most recent SciFi films) in that it actually explained where its Kaiju came from and why they acted in the manner that they did. They also explained why they developed the Jaegers (bombs and guns and other military hardware were unable to take Kaiju down before they did a lot of destruction) and even had a good reason for the two pilot system. But keep in mind all of these simply meant that Pacific Rim did a better job of following its own "world rules" not that it became scientifically plausible.
Yes, but these kaiju movies do not invite scrutiny because they have no scientific canon backing them up. Merlin can do magical shit because the canon says he can.
Kaiju movies may not, but that is not what Bluce is saying, he is saying Pac Rim does.
And I have been telling him why it does not.
Except you said they need to properly explain Godzilla's fire breath because just saying "well, he was born from a nuke blast and his breath is nuke breath" isn't enough.
Pacific Rim = Giant robots punching giant monsters in the face.
Godzilla = The imagination from the unknown effects of fallout of the time.
Both are fun so I don't care.
Im glad Godzilla was not in Pacific Rim. But they are going to have to explain where he came from in this movie. The idiotic lizard they had in the American version with Broderick at least had a plausible origin (as far as science fiction goes), but them making it a hermaphrodite and laying eggs and such... Godzilla can shoot "fire". He is takker than many skyscrapers, and they are going to have to tell us some how and why if they want him to be loved in the 21st century like he was for the past few decades. . He looks the same though! No mistaking him for any other creature. They even got his trademark screech right.
Yeah, not the same thing. One has elements of theoretical and actual science built into the genre and the other is just pure nonsensical fantasy.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk
That is because Star Trek is science fiction, and kaiju movies ARE fantasy. My point is that starting with Pacific Rim, they seem to be trying to move it closer to science fiction than it has ever been before. Star Wars is also nonsensical fantasy
Don't make me Heisenberg yo ass.Will Malcolm's dad save the world?
Don't make me Heisenberg yo ass.