OMG...this show sooooo needs "the treatment". Thing is, the ratings are pretty good.
![facepalm :facepalm: :facepalm:](/gforums/../gforums/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/facepalm.gif)
. That is scary because it means that nobody cares about good TV anymore. OR, that I am just out of touch with "today's audience". I just hate The Walking Dead. Its really really bad, much worse than SGU to me.
I think the good ratings are because it's a completely new genre for TV and everyone was fascinated at the beginning. The first season wasn't that long (6 episodes I think?) and it was unique as viewing goes so everyone was talking about it. People who missed out on the show the first time around didn't want to be left out and jumped on the bandwagon for Season 2, hence the huge ratings. This is coupled with the fact that all of us wanted the show to be great, we wanted it to do good so we kept watching.
As it is there were plenty of serious fans who got disappointed with Season 2. Some dropped off but were easily replaced with slack-jawed fools who didn't care about the quality of what they were watching, they just wanted to be able to say they watched the coolest, hottest show on TV right now. (Seriously, there are TONS of people like that out there, trust me, I've met plenty of them in my life.)
As it is TWD will probably continue to do well for a few more seasons. The producers have been empowered by the success of the concept so they will no doubt continue to do what they want despite criticism. And if you saw that episode of
The Talking Dead where Dave Navarro chastised one of the show's producers about how boring the show had gotten and how lame it was that they were still stuck on the farm for the whole season you'd have seen the producer genuinely confused over being criticized. Seriously, he was actually uncomfortable that anyone would dare negatively critique his work of art. It was very telling.
At any rate, I found Season 2 to be soooooooooo bad that it was good in terms of material to make fun of. Season 3 promises to be the same as the Lori comment about Rick getting them further than she had thought proves. It's such a stupid line to give a character because it's not true at all, lol! Rick is a moron who didn't get them
anywhere. He didn't find the farm they went to in Season 2. For that matter he wasn't even conscious in the first season to get his family out of Atlanta; Shane was the one who did that. Then, when Rick did find his family he immediately left them to go find Merle, a murderous Aryan dick head. He left his family and the others
repeatedly; he didn't keep an eye on his son who caused all sorts of trouble (he actually had to have Shane, the supposed "bad guy", point out that he needed to be a father to Karl
late in season 2); he opted to keep everyone on a farm that held a barn full of zombies -- bad decision after bad decision after bad decision. Yet according to Lori (the writers actually) he got them further than anyone else. According to them Rick is a hero...
:icon_rolleyes:
It's truly writing so bad that it's good. I'm fascinated by the fact that the writers are completely unaware of how erroneous and contradictory their writing is. Rick is a moron and so is Lori yet they are held up as the protagonists, the "good guys" so to speak. It's a total farce on par with
A Confederacy of Dunces (a great comedic book). The character's actions lead to belly shaking guffaws which is not what the writers intend I'm sure, but that's the best way to respond to their tripe. Viewing TWD as a comedy
is the proper way to approach this show and in that vein I look forward to Season 3.