Fans determine what makes or breaks a show, franchise, movie, or any commercial media product. Give them what they like and they buy it. Fail to do that, and you become irrelevant and lose money. Disney is learning that very expensive lesson as I write this with the failure of Galaxy's Edge in both Disney theme parks. The CW is learning quickly that a twisted, feminist woke version of Batman/Batwoman does not have an audience sufficient enough to maintain the reason for it to exist. Star Trek Discovery has even fewer viewers than the 1970's animated series did, and unless CBS All Access can afford to produce it without it performing, then it is going to fade away.
How about I make a prediction today that Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker will make less money than The Force Awakens and The Last Jedi. I base that on the negative fan response to the trailers, the disjointed and shallow Disney Star Wars sequel trilogy, and the overall apathy to it. All of this is because Disney took Star wars and changed it into something else that the fans don't want.
The Orville is the Star Trek show that Star Trek fans were looking for, but it isn't Star Trek, it's the Orville. It is as if the spirit of Star Trek transferred to The Orville and that show will be carrying the torch for Roddenberry's vision, even though Roddenberry never lived to see it. Discovery is a completely different thing from Star Trek, even though it is officially Star Trek. If the fans do not accept NuTrek as Star Trek, it won't be head canon no matter what they want it to be. And the fans will just ignore it. So, yeah, these dumb new Star Trek shows are canon unto themselves, but they are not part of the original canon ending with Nemesis. Let's see what they do with Picard, since they now have access to the original license. If it isn't a recognizable Picard, then the fans will not like the show. If it is good, the show will succeed. It's pretty straightforward.
It's also been renewed for a second season.
Yay! Only one more day before I can watch Star Trek: Picard on CBS All Access!
they have made up "science-y" explanations which are nonsense,
I am going to differ from some here in that I have maintained (and there are threads in this forum about it) that a lot of Trek tech is more on the fantasy side. The Transporter is a prime example of this and so is the holodeck. I would also state that the Trek Warp drive is less scientifically plausible than the NuBSG Jump drive.
For Warp, the main reason the BSG jump drive is something I researched was its resemblance to the jump drives in earlier literary science fiction (Asimov, Cherryh's Alliance-Union stories, etc.). Like warp drive it has a theoretical basis that is better than pure fantasy (Jump is an extrapolation of superstring and M theories; Warp an extension of the Alcubierre drive theory). And both have a similar issue - how to induce the needed effect. We have no idea at all how to induce a warp bubble or even if it can be induced. Likewise, we have no idea of how to induce a sharp enough gravitational gradient to fold space without crushing the ship in the process; not to mention how even to induce such a gravity effect period.
I am going to differ from some here in that I have maintained (and there are threads in this forum about it) that a lot of Trek tech is more on the fantasy side. The Transporter is a prime example of this and so is the holodeck. I would also state that the Trek Warp drive is less scientifically plausible than the NuBSG Jump drive.
For Warp, the main reason the BSG jump drive is something I researched was its resemblance to the jump drives in earlier literary science fiction (Asimov, Cherryh's Alliance-Union stories, etc.). Like warp drive it has a theoretical basis that is better than pure fantasy (Jump is an extrapolation of superstring and M theories; Warp an extension of the Alcubierre drive theory). And both have a similar issue - how to induce the needed effect. We have no idea at all how to induce a warp bubble or even if it can be induced. Likewise, we have no idea of how to induce a sharp enough gravitational gradient to fold space without crushing the ship in the process; not to mention how even to induce such a gravity effect period.
Using a controlled matter/antimatter reaction to power coils which generates a region of warped space to travel faster than light may be out of our reach technologically, but the theory is scientifically sound. Creating an interactive robot is already here. An extrapolation of that would be a being like Data. But not being able to take some sort of "neuron" from it to "clone" a new android individual. That is like claiming somebody can take a random file from your computer and clone the whole system from it. This is what Picard has made the basis of the twin Dajh characters, and why her entire existence in the show becomes ridiculous. No mention of LAL at all either.have not watched the show, but your one sentence here---
i have posted in various places asking about the science of trek stuff, whether warp drive or 'beaming' or android and holgram tech
the frequent answer given is something that varies around-- "ST is a tv show and none of what is in it can ever be expected to be real science" "the stuff in trek defies the laws of physics"
Sadly, most of the audience for this show IS stupid. At least in terms of understanding how the tech works in Star Trek and the theoretical science it is based upon. Lets not even get into how the Romulan EMPIRE, made up of dozens of star systems, became a ragtag group of displaced refugees brought low enough to have to work as domestics on earth. It's ridiculous.Shhhh.....you’re not supposed to notice this stuff. The writers think the audience is stupid...
Can anyone here explain to me how a clone with only a positronic brain and not robotic anatomy like Data had , has beyond super strength and can take out 12 men twice her size in mere seconds , jump 30 feet into the air , land without breaking a friggin leg , then somehow have a huge explosive device inside this human cloned body ?
Anyone , anyone ? She handles herself exactly like Alita Battle Angel but Alita has a Berzerker Body which is a specifically design fighting Cyborg body if you are not familiar with Alita storyline .
I also have trouble understanding Picard . He reminds me of the old man character from 2001 A Space Odyssey .
Got a good laugh from watching the stunt double run for him tho , that was hilarious .