a possibly far older construction BENEATH the very old Dendera temple complex-- you know, the one with the wall art of 'lightbulbs' and many other pictures found no where else in Egypt
the guy asks a good question as do so many others who posit that far older civ's then the ones accepted by mainstream academia did exist----why no attention given to this find?
of course so many other finds as well-- why no attn given to the findings of water erosion on the the soil around the sphinx (soil layer of around 8,000 yrs ago) or the 'rooms' under the sphinx?
no attention given to the finds of sunken towns and small cities along ancient coastlines? all of which would have been inundated by the last great ice sheet, cap, glacier that about 10,000 yrs ago?
why no attention given to the DNA evidence that builds a solid link that shows a migration from central asia, through northern africa and then into south america and even to the south pacific? (mentioned here before by me and includes the story of the naturally 'pointy headed' peoples found in all of those places who are all linked by DNA)
i think that modern academia stands to lose much in the way of grants, prestige and the 'ownership' of knowledge if they ever admitted that there were older civilizations. i mean how can they admit they have been wrong and a novelist (graham hancock) and others ,untrained, are right?