G
Graybrew1
Guest
Well what's the link to the latest altercation?
It starts before this page. But here is the last one.
http://forum.gateworld.net/threads/79051-Is-having-sex-while-using-communication-stones-rape/page19
Well what's the link to the latest altercation?
It starts before this page. But here is the last one.
http://forum.gateworld.net/threads/79051-Is-having-sex-while-using-communication-stones-rape/page19
Like I said, it's generally a waste of time interacting with the morons over at GW. All that will be accomplished will be your wasted cyber breath and rising blood pressure on your part.
This thread you linked proves it as you're dealing with people who are literally trying to parse the definition of "rape" to fit their argument. And it's really not an argument at all to be honest as the issue of engaging in sex while occupying another person's body simply would be a moot point. It just wouldn't happen. The legal implications alone would prevent it. Even if someone did sign away their "right" to have their body used for sex they could always come back later and file suit. Imagine if you consented to let your body be used for sex and ended up with herpes or AIDS? There is simply no way in hell the military or any institution would let this happen -- period.
In sci-fi there is the element of suspension of disbelief but in this case it simply isn't possible. The legal and moral and ethical implications are so great that it wouldn't be allowed. This is so incredibly obvious that I find it a waste of time to even discuss it (not with you, I mean with people like the idiots over at GW). There quite simply is no argument about it.
In bringing this back to the subject of this thread let me just point out, again, how demented Gilmore's take is on the Stargate fan base. The people over at GW who are advocating for the immoral, unethical and illegal use of the stones are the very people he thinks are worthy Stargate fans. Yet those of us here who eschew the legitimacy of the stones are considered "idiots" by him. How twisted is that?
It starts before this page. But here is the last one.
http://forum.gateworld.net/threads/79051-Is-having-sex-while-using-communication-stones-rape/page19
I thought you did rather well with ur post at GW. I'm impressed, you highlighted what was actually said in the episode and yeah, in no way was actually stated that sexual intercourse could be performed with the host body, while personal stuff could (i.e. urinating, cleaning). Therefore yeah, rape. It's not a grey issue IMO, it's rather black and whote, I fail to see how difficult it is to comprehend it. You do not use another individual's body for sexual pleasure without consent by that individual there and then.Agreed, and very nice segway. :icon_e_wink:
I thought you did rather well with ur post at GW. I'm impressed, you highlighted what was actually said in the episode and yeah, in no way was actually stated that sexual intercourse could be performed with the host body, while personal stuff could (i.e. urinating, cleaning). Therefore yeah, rape. It's not a grey issue IMO, it's rather black and whote, I fail to see how difficult it is to comprehend it. You do not use another individual's body for sexual pleasure without consent by that individual there and then.
Those that advocate that this isn't rape, well I wouldn't want to meet them since well they are pigs, who probably expect their sexual partners to do their every bidding and be obedient to them, no different to cave men who owns their sexual prey. The very thought disgusts me tbh. How are they any different to wife beaters, or rapists? If they believe that what SGU did in regards to sex with comm stones isn't rape, not only would I be questioning their judge of character, their morality, their sense of right and wrong, but also honestly, I would request the authorities to arrest them and have them psychologically tested. These people should be put under 24/7 watch. These people are the social deviants that cause harm to our societies and countless innocents. Who knows, these people could be paedophiles or abusers behind their screen names. Are they going to tell me human trafficking is fine cos some guy has signed a contract with some guy? Beating your wife up is fine cos you have signed some marriage contract? Seriously? What is wrong with these people?!
They can't see that what they are advocating is so wrong. How could anyone have sex under the influence of comm stones, where the owner of the host body has no say at that moment in time? Plus supposedly had signed a piece of paper with questionable wording makes it even worst! This is not the Stargate that I know and I am disgusted that some of the "fans" have absolutely poor sense of morality, poor sense of justice and judgement. I'm gay and as liberal as you can get and even I am disgusted by this.
I thought you did rather well with ur post at GW. I'm impressed, you highlighted what was actually said in the episode and yeah, in no way was actually stated that sexual intercourse could be performed with the host body, while personal stuff could (i.e. urinating, cleaning). Therefore yeah, rape. It's not a grey issue IMO, it's rather black and whote, I fail to see how difficult it is to comprehend it. You do not use another individual's body for sexual pleasure without consent by that individual there and then.
Those that advocate that this isn't rape, well I wouldn't want to meet them since well they are pigs, who probably expect their sexual partners to do their every bidding and be obedient to them, no different to cave men who owns their sexual prey. The very thought disgusts me tbh. How are they any different to wife beaters, or rapists? If they believe that what SGU did in regards to sex with comm stones isn't rape, not only would I be questioning their judge of character, their morality, their sense of right and wrong, but also honestly, I would request the authorities to arrest them and have them psychologically tested. These people should be put under 24/7 watch. These people are the social deviants that cause harm to our societies and countless innocents. Who knows, these people could be paedophiles or abusers behind their screen names. Are they going to tell me human trafficking is fine cos some guy has signed a contract with some guy? Beating your wife up is fine cos you have signed some marriage contract? Seriously? What is wrong with these people?!
They can't see that what they are advocating is so wrong. How could anyone have sex under the influence of comm stones, where the owner of the host body has no say at that moment in time? Plus supposedly had signed a piece of paper with questionable wording makes it even worst! This is not the Stargate that I know and I am disgusted that some of the "fans" have absolutely poor sense of morality, poor sense of justice and judgement. I'm gay and as liberal as you can get and even I am disgusted by this.
How many times has sex using the stones featured on the show - once?
It was a bad call for sure but I think they realised that and removed that aspect from the show. Every show makes that silly error they wish they could reverse - 3 shots to get rid of the body?
Young and his wife, season 1 (x2)
Telford and Young's wife (x1)
Wray and her lover (x1, but for a whole week)
Besides those, Young used them to sign divorce papers. Eli and Chloe useed them to go clubbing and to get drunk and end up crying to each other drunk in a car. I think that if the writers had realized how horrible the stones and their use were, they would have found a way to ELIMINATE THEM from the show completely.
Part of the SG training I thought was to be prepared for whatever happens. One minute you're offworld, the next you could travel back in time, or forward, you could dial into a Goa'uld mothership, or encounter living breathing Ancients, or stumble onto Replicators or a planet about to implode, SGC could be overrun by The Trust operatives or aliens, whatever. Hence why I don't believe in the whole, "wrong people at the wrong place" tagline. That's what the SG training is for, so you are prepared for whatever happens.They're worse, it's like they took some patients from mental institutions and stuck em in uniforms. Another unrealistic aspect, how they even got in the Stargate program, I can understand one or two blips, but that many in one place? I wouldn't call em space cowboys cause that'd be an insult to space cowboys , Mal's totally a space cowboy, lol. Without the hat.
Yeah, apparently there was no psych evaluation. haha, for something trying to be realistic, they really go left field with it.Part of the SG training I thought was to be prepared for whatever happens. One minute you're offworld, the next you could travel back in time, or forward, you could dial into a Goa'uld mothership, or encounter living breathing Ancients, or stumble onto Replicators or a planet about to implode, SGC could be overrun by The Trust operatives or aliens, whatever. Hence why I don't believe in the whole, "wrong people at the wrong place" tagline. That's what the SG training is for, so you are prepared for whatever happens.
Young and his wife, season 1 (x2)
Telford and Young's wife (x1)
Wray and her lover (x1, but for a whole week)
Besides those, Young used them to sign divorce papers. Eli and Chloe useed them to go clubbing and to get drunk and end up crying to each other drunk in a car. I think that if the writers had realized how horrible the stones and their use were, they would have found a way to ELIMINATE THEM from the show completely.
I think Wray having sex was very much implied. Why else did they show the bedroom after the romance stuff? I forget the scene and episode though.
I think Wray having sex was very much implied. Why else did they show the bedroom after the romance stuff? I forget the scene and episode though.