Hey Mr. Anderson
I was clarifying a point with regards to a comment by Bikerwriter regarding the "stupid worthless dollar". I was saying nothing beyond that. But, to happily answer your questions...
For the last 2-3 years, with the dollar near or at par, the dollar difference has ceased to be an incentive for film companies to come to Vancouver. Vancouver now competes on an even footing with all other jurisdictions in North America as far as currency considerations go.
Nothing has to be filmed in Vancouver. Vancouver is a popular film location for the following reasons, among others:
Large pool of highly experienced crews
Very well established purpose built studio facilities
Very well established post production facilities
Excellent availability of production equipment
Climate - very mild, very little if any snow (bucket loads of @#$^^# rain however...)
Availability of many different types of locations within a short distance of the city (ocean, mountain, city, country, or any combination of the above...)
Same time zone as LA
Short travel time to LA
A prevailing indifference to the stars... they are able to travel the city, dine out etc. largely accosted
Most locations have not been 'burned'. Filming is welcomed (ok, tollerated...) in most areas still
Competitive tax credits
There are many compelling reasons for film companies to film in many different cities, states, countries. Currency rates can definately play a role, but in Vancouvers case, production numbers have stayed very good despite having lost that advantage. The savings created by filming in one location over another do not generally play a significant difference in profits, it does however maximize the value for the production dollars spent.
Cheers!!
DCO