Recently I did a rewatch of Seasons 1-3 of Gene Rodenberry's Andromeda from videos on YouTube (a lot of old shows are there). While it started with me being bored and looking to just watch something different I discovered that this show (at least the first two seasons) is much better than I remembered.
So, what made it better?
First, world building. Robert Hewitt Wolfe was the show runner for the first season and a half and he did quite a job of world building for his show universe. He developed in a short time fleshed out descriptions of both alien races (like the Magog) and human entities like the Nietzscheans. Indeed, in season one a very well written episode was "Double Helix" where Dylan (the lead character) recalls a game of Go with his Nietzschean first officer before the fall of the Commonwealth (the civilization in power at the start of the show - the premiere episode has its fall and Dylan and the ship being caught in a singularity and frozen in time for three centuries). The recollection of the game and his discussion with his first officer is used cleverly to explain the core of Nietzschean philosophy.
Second, overall the characters are well drawn and well acted. Special kudos have to go to Lexa Doig, who played as many as three characters in the same episode and made them all work well. She played the sentient AI of the titular starship and did it very well. Also Lisa Ryder did a good turn as salvage captain Beka Valentine, as did Brent Stait as Rev Bem.
Third, overall the story threads were interesting and logical. However, see the section on "flaws" also.
Then come the flaws:
One, Kevin Sorbo was a bit flat as Dylan the lead character. It really did not cause an issue in the first few seasons as the show was VERY ensemble in nature and he was not dominant in the stories. Alas later in the show after Wolfe was forced out he did become more prominent but still flat.
Two, again after the departure of Wolfe the story became less tightly written and more episodic action. It was still okay for action pablum but not what it was. Weirdly though, in its last season the writing improved again.
Overall though, better than I remembered.
So, what made it better?
First, world building. Robert Hewitt Wolfe was the show runner for the first season and a half and he did quite a job of world building for his show universe. He developed in a short time fleshed out descriptions of both alien races (like the Magog) and human entities like the Nietzscheans. Indeed, in season one a very well written episode was "Double Helix" where Dylan (the lead character) recalls a game of Go with his Nietzschean first officer before the fall of the Commonwealth (the civilization in power at the start of the show - the premiere episode has its fall and Dylan and the ship being caught in a singularity and frozen in time for three centuries). The recollection of the game and his discussion with his first officer is used cleverly to explain the core of Nietzschean philosophy.
Second, overall the characters are well drawn and well acted. Special kudos have to go to Lexa Doig, who played as many as three characters in the same episode and made them all work well. She played the sentient AI of the titular starship and did it very well. Also Lisa Ryder did a good turn as salvage captain Beka Valentine, as did Brent Stait as Rev Bem.
Third, overall the story threads were interesting and logical. However, see the section on "flaws" also.
Then come the flaws:
One, Kevin Sorbo was a bit flat as Dylan the lead character. It really did not cause an issue in the first few seasons as the show was VERY ensemble in nature and he was not dominant in the stories. Alas later in the show after Wolfe was forced out he did become more prominent but still flat.
Two, again after the departure of Wolfe the story became less tightly written and more episodic action. It was still okay for action pablum but not what it was. Weirdly though, in its last season the writing improved again.
Overall though, better than I remembered.
Last edited: