Gatefan1976
Well Known GateFan
Maybe in the next movie she'll accidentally step in front of Thor just as he is throwing Mjolinir.....
We can hope, but it's as likely as finding Mary Magdaline nailed to the cross instead.
Maybe in the next movie she'll accidentally step in front of Thor just as he is throwing Mjolinir.....
Or in the next film they will recast her and there will be actual chemistry, and Thor and Jane finally embrace....and she turns into Loki!
WOW! You definitely have a point there! This is her:
View attachment 28751
She would have been PERFECT.
Well, he IS Sleipnir's mother, after all, as I recall...
Of course I'm referring to Loki.You recall correctly (if you are referring to Loki)
Of course I'm referring to Loki.
The other day, Portman jokingly claimed that the only reason she was cast in the part as "Jane" is that she's so little, she makes the Asgardians look even taller.I think we're talking about two different things (at least) here.
I know jack about the Marvel Thor, his life and times, so I know nothing about Jane either or the movie version's suitability for the hero.
I was mostly chiming in on *why* Natalie Portman. She's pretty. BAM!
Portman was horrible in both the Avengers and in Thor TDW.You know, don't watch this movie when up all night and sick - it makes the flaws ever more apparent.
For example, the plot is nonsensical. Thor and Loki play well off of each other but Natalie Portman is embarrassingly bad as Jane. In fact, is there a plot?
All I'm seeing are tits. Tits, tits and more tits, sigh...
Where? And why am I not seeing these "tits" on this forum?
All I'm seeing are tits. Tits, tits and more tits, sigh...
Where? And why am I not seeing these "tits" on this forum?
Its in the Sooper Seekrit Tit Forum....I thought you knew!