YJ02
Well Known GateFan
Star Wars is a consumerist franchise
show me one franchise that is not for profit
Star Wars is a consumerist franchise
No digging through unpublished scripts or flipping through comic books.
The Star Wars brand on iceberg lettuce means nothing since most millennials eat romaine or red leaf or kale.
I love Star Wars, but it feels different since Episode VII and after. The only new film I really loved was Rogue One.
A Rey cosplay outfit has no interest for young boys
sw's is not alone on using merchandising to promote its films:
this is still for sale--$145
or the spock grenadier decanter!!
and you got to have your corn flakes to start your day before fighting the borg like cpt picard!!
or some tex mex from Del taco!!
AND DO NOT forget your Klingon happy meal before you go to warp!
LOL! Great searching, but still a fail. Star Trek toys are still selling to this day. Mind you, not the new stuff from 2009 and after, but the TOS, TNG. DS9 and Voyager stuff. Enterprise stuff is not doing great, but there really isn't that much of it out there. The magnitude of Star Wars toys and licensing is WAAAAYYYY bigger than with Star Trek ever was, and even with the might of Disney behind it, the toys are not selling.
oh wait
excuse me while I readjust for your goal post movement
this was all in reply to your insinuation that ONLY star wars uses such advertising
dont you have anythign to say about the Klingon whopper or the st happy meals
or the Mr Spock cereal...or the Grenadine decanter in the shape of SPocks head?!
in the future, pls inform me when you once again make a statement where you intend to change the requirements for what you will accept as an answer, "proof" or anything else that will otherwise point out that what you said or inferred/implied to generate the given answer, proof or anything else, was wrong or imprecise
this way i can have my goal post readjustment crew on standby
I said that Star Wars is a consumerist franchise.
every show and movie is for profit
i am sure the investors in every movie and show demand a high return from all possible methods. i guess if they want to put their characters on lettuce, then so be it
True, the bolded. But profit is the basics. Even the illegal alien selling oranges is selling them for a profit. What takes Star Wars far beyond simple profit and franchises like The Expanse, The Orville and Star Trek (NuTrek) is the construct created of theme parks, branded produce and household appliances, tie-ins with McDonalds and themed cruises on the Disney Cruise Lines ships. And of course, for the little guys there are the "official" books and games and toys. All of which are NOT SELLING. Disney has published the numbers, this is not a guess. Unless rabid fans who are able to acknowledge that the SW franchise is flawed and suggest changes instead of saying everything is okay, will help it to become more like the Star Wars it's fans deserve.
i dont care about products or tie ins or C3PO lettuce, Happy Meals (like Trek did) or a klingon Burger at Burger King
i only care about the story being told
there are plenty of fans who are saying that the new trilogy is NOT ok, as I have. It was inevitable that DISNEY was going to follow Lucas' plan to do another Skywalker trilogy
and, even if he was in charge for it, it wold still have been much of the same re-hash and parallelism with the OT like JJ and Johnson have done
you can only beat to death the same old characters (with or without the same actors) for so long
Lucas also wanted to tell anthology stories. one reason he tried to get a live action series on tv to do this very thing. the idea that became ROGUE ONE was initially approved by Lucas and got carried over into Disney-ville.
the anthologies and tv series' are the way to go. if they ever make a new trilogy outside of the Skywalker drama, that too would be good, so long as it told some new stories with new-or little used- characters
Every tv show and movie from SW's-except rogue one- all basically had some sort of open ending. but TPTBs have got to stop rehashing shit from previous works as they are doing now. something that is so very apparent in the EP 9 trailer
FINALLY WE AGREE! I agree with everything you said there.
Disney only eliminated the EU because they did not have control of it and therefore could not monetize any of the characters fleshed out in the EU.
i have been saying this or some variation of it, the whole time. i believe either my first or second post in this thread referred to 'jj fuckery'
no, the EU, was licensed by LUCAS ARTS, so since DISNEY bought it, they control it
one example of the chaos tha twas the EU under lucas only was that his company would license then call 'canon' nearly every thing that came out under the eu
the Yuzhon Vong (spelling) the alien race that invaded the galaxy core after ROTJ and caused the imperial remnant and the new republic to ally, was called 'canon'. even though that would have thrown a monkey fuck into Lucas' plans for the new Skywalker trilogy.
lucasarts/lucasfilm story group (the new canon controllers) ditched that and has not came close to bringing it back--hopefully it stays that way.
another example that could have been used (and may be still if PALPATINE "comes back" as a clone of himself) was the story of the game force unleashed.
in it the empire took over the clone facilites of Kamino. where palp and vader created a breif run of new non Fett clones for the army. and, created clones for himself.
the hero of the game, Star killer/ Galen Marek, was an apprentice of Vader in the game. he nature of his service-meant to be a Jedi hunter, is thought to be the 'spark' that helped create the Inquisitors in REBELS
So, the LUCASFILM GROUP/DISNEY does indeed pick and choose from the EU- which is now called LEGENDS
it is like a pool of reserve troops! and i have defi said this here and elsewhere = IMO, this is very lazy and borders on intellectual theft
they (pre disney lucas) blessed the works of individual authors of comics and novels and the creators of vid games, called them canon and then made money off of the material back then
then Lucas sold out for what? A billion dollars, and probably residuals as well as a chunk of cash from anything new (guessing on that)
and, DISNEY has lucasfilm/ pablo hidalgo, call up from their ready reserve force of characters and ideas-aka LEGENDS- whenever they want something or someone new
Wedge Antilles in REBELS was one example as was Beckett and Dyden Vos from SOLO, yes they were criminals in the EU but for SOLO they were brushed off and repackaged in a new form
no one can call it retcon or any real change to them though, as their previous existence is verboten!!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
i hope that this is a clear statement of my position although long winded
Mattell or Hasbro who make the toys under license
Money from LICENSING, not owned outright. You need to understand how that works.