Confirmed: Batman’s armor will be equipped with Kryptonite in ‘Batman v Superman’
http://batman-news.com/2015/07/02/c...quipped-with-kryptonite-in-batman-v-superman/
Ugh.
Confirmed: Batman’s armor will be equipped with Kryptonite in ‘Batman v Superman’
http://batman-news.com/2015/07/02/c...quipped-with-kryptonite-in-batman-v-superman/
Confirmed: Batman’s armor will be equipped with Kryptonite in ‘Batman v Superman’
http://batman-news.com/2015/07/02/c...quipped-with-kryptonite-in-batman-v-superman/
I had a funny feeling...
No doubt they will say Batman has kryptonite embedded in that armor.
they did in SmallvilleMakes you wonder why no one ever just made a bullet out of kryptonite and shot Superman with it...
I was just thinking that Superman creates the same issue for the Justice League that Thor creates for the Avengers.
Both of them are so ridiculously overpowered in their universe that in order to create a challenge writers have to create insanely powerful (and hence ridiculous) enemies. In essence, it means they can never tell a "small story", which in turn means the films all become almost TOO epic.
Silly as it sounds, one of the things I liked about films like the first Iron Man, the original X-Men, the first Captain America and even Guardians of the Galaxy was that the stories were relatively smaller. In Guardians case, that was the more remarkable as the opponent had powers in universe that were not that much lower than Thor's. It was just that the way the plot was written he was not given the opportunity to employ them fully.
In short, I think it's time for Marvel and DC to put the demigod superheroes on the shelf for a while.
On a humorous note, Batman vs. Superman is getting blasted by critics as being as bad if not worse than Man of Steel and for largely the same reasons (humorless, way overblown CGI). Also it seems the boxoffice expectations are being scaled back....
On a humorous note, Batman vs. Superman is getting blasted by critics as being as bad if not worse than Man of Steel and for largely the same reasons (humorless, way overblown CGI). Also it seems the boxoffice expectations are being scaled back....
The side effect of BB and TDK being darker, but done well.
On a humorous note, Batman vs. Superman is getting blasted by critics as being as bad if not worse than Man of Steel and for largely the same reasons (humorless, way overblown CGI). Also it seems the boxoffice expectations are being scaled back....
Weeeeelllll ... if you're curious:
Even Batman was originally not so grim in the cartoon, he was the "super detective" with gadgets.Given that this film seems to suffer from the exact same problems that Man of Steel did, maybe there is a hint in there about why DC can't seem to make decent films of late about any of its characters other than Batman. And that is....
DC nowadays is trying to make their films WAY too bleak, dark and pseudo operatic. It works okay with Batman because the character is specifically designed for such a setting, but even there the Nolan trilogy did go too far into humorlessness. One think I really like about Tim Burton's Batman is that while it is dark it still has its humorous moments which serve to give the film balance.
As the Joker said, Why so serious?However, aside from Batman DC has no other characters that belong in these types of settings. Superman certainly does not and neither do Wonder Woman, Green Lantern, Aquaman et al. Marvel's films are vastly superior because they get that the films tone and pace need to align properly to the superhero(es) in them. Hence Iron Man had a sort of techno-action sarcastic vibe to it while Thor felt (especially the parts on Asgard) like a sort of epic fantasy.
Nope. They have killed their 2 biggest franchises in one crap movie!Will they ever learn?
Yep.
They simply -cannot- write good stories that translate well to the 2-3 hour formula. They also can't seem to cast worth a damn these days. Cavell is -horrid- as Superman, and while I will reserve judgement on Affleck (as when he nails a role, he can be damn good), I am not expecting much from him. Batman Begins and TDK were good stories, but Bale was -terrible- as Bruce Wayne, which hurt him as Batman. Morgan Freeman and Heath Ledger were the only 2 stand out actors in the movies IMHO.
Hey, Gal Gadot is hot, don't make her a good Wonder Woman. She should have just showed up as herself and shot Superman with a kryptonite bullet.I'm torn. On one hand I take offense at your harsh, unfounded criticism of the incredibly hot Henry Cavell. But, I agree with you about Bale. In fact, I would go further and say he stunk not only as Bruce Wayne but most especially as Batman (his fight scenes in the final movie were laughably bad).
Either/or*Granted, I don't care for Superman as a character at all so my interest in the role is strictly Cavell-based (biased?).
And yet, I bet he shows more range of emotion than Henry "I am Groot stickboy" Cavell.........**Oh! And Ben Affleck is a turd. A big, stinking turd. Why he doesn't have the good sense to drink himself to death like most "actors" of his caliber is beyond me.
Hey, Gal Gadot is hot, don't make her a good Wonder Woman. She should have just showed up as herself and shot Superman with a kryptonite bullet.
Either/or
And yet, I bet he shows more range of emotion than Henry "I am Groot stickboy" Cavell.........
Look man, you have one simple job, keep your boy toys locked up in your dungeon, but you keep letting them out and inflicting them on us!!